Joseph: The following is the V. C. Summer
Station response to your questions:
1) What are other plants goals/expectations for maintaining
power level? (=/- MW or goal); How easy is it to maintain?
Is there a band within which you
operate?
The attached file Ops @ the Licensed
Limit.doc contains the guidance our operators use for maintaining reactor power
as close to the licensed limit (2900 MWT) as practicable. I have also
included a 24 hour plot of data that illustrates our reactor power and
feedwater flow rate. As you will see we typically have minute to minute
swings in feedwater flow rate based calculated reactor power in the range of 3
to 5 MWT.
2) How is your
secondary calculation performed? (Averaging Inputs, Instantaneous values,
combination) Is it a module
or program on you plant computer or
is it an off-line routine?
Our calorimetric power calculation is
feedwater flow rate based. Our new plant process computer now performs
this calculation once a second. However, many of the inputs are one minute
average values of one second instantaneous values. The one minute
averaging is a holdover from our old (slow) computer that we have had no reason
to change. The calculation does not need to be performed at a one second
rate but we do it anyway because our new computer can easily handle it.
3) Are your temperature and flow transmitters set
specifically for this calculation? (dampening or bias settings)
All of the instruments that provide input
to the calorimetric are calibrated once every 18 months. Most also
undergo quarterly Op tests. However, the instruments themselves have no
special dampening or bias settings. All averaging is done by the plant
computer.
4) Are any of your control loops (Feedwater) used in
the secondary calorimetric calculation?
Our feedwater flow rate transmitters used
by the calorimetric computer program also provide protection and control
functions as well. The steam generator level control system uses these
transmitters as does our reactor protection system.
5) Have you had any issues related to power swings or
related to your secondary calorimetric?
Yes. As you can see in the attached plot
of power and feedwater flow rate we occasionally encounter spikes in feed flow
in our A loop. We are currently trying to understand the cause of these
spikes but so far the solution eludes us.
Bill Bell
Chemical Engineer
Reactor Engineering
V. C. Summer Station
803-345-4389
From: pwrrm-bounces@retaqs.com
[mailto:pwrrm-bounces@retaqs.com] On Behalf
Of WILLETT, JOSEPH E
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007
4:01 PM
To: pwrrm@retaqs.com
Cc: BLESSIE, WILLIAM J
Subject: [Pwrrm] Reactor Power
Control, Expectaions and Performance
We have not implemented Appendix K using ultrasonic
flow measurement for feedwater as of yet.
Our Question(s)
1) What are other plants goals/expectations for maintaining
power level? (=/- MW or goal); How easy is it to maintain?
Is there a band within which you
operate?
2) How is your secondary calculation performed?
(Averaging Inputs, Instantaneous values, combination) Is it a module
or program on you plant computer or
is it an off-line routine?
3) Are your temperature and flow transmitters set
specifically for this calculation? (dampening or bias settings)
4) Are any of your control loops (Feedwater) used in
the secondary calorimetric calculation?
5) Have you had any issues related to power swings or
related to your secondary calorimetric?
J. E. Willett
"Only those who will
risk going too far can
possibly find out
how far one can go."
T.S. Eliot (1888-1965)
----------------------------------------------------
Joseph E.
Willett, P.E.
Principal
Reactor Engineer, Nuclear Operations
E-mail: jwillett@oppd.com OR Joseph_Willett@hotmail.com
Omaha Public Power District Phone:
P.O. Box 399
Mail Station: FC-1-1 Plant
|