From: rcrc@retaqs.com
[mailto:rcrc@retaqs.com] On Behalf Of edward.mcvey@exeloncorp.com
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008
1:05 PM
To: HawnRS@INPO.org;
rcadams@duke-energy.com; calday@entergy.com; aaaustin@duke-energy.com;
lsbarnes@tva.gov; Robert.A.Borchert@dom.com; Erik.Flodin@aps.com;
fred.gershkoff@sce.com; Kevin.Graham@aps.com; Martin.Grissom@aps.com;
Johnny.Henderson@dom.com; hustonr@firstenergycorp.com;
lakeller@duke-energy.com; Adina.K.Lafrance@dom.com; gary.marsh@pgnmail.com;
jbmcinvale@ameren.com; NestelWA@INPO.org; kevin_randall@fpl.com;
William.Stackler@pseg.com; William.Stanley@exeloncorp.com;
mstrickland1@scana.com; Norman.Terrel@Luminant.com;
gordon.verdin@constellation.com; jwillett@oppd.com;
gwilson@firstenergycorp.com; ronald.niederer@exeloncorp.com;
javier.sanchez@exeloncorp.com; Howard.Crawford@exeloncorp.com
Cc: rcrc@retaqs.com
Subject: Re: [RCRC] PWR Reactor
Engineering Working Meeting
PWR RE Colleagues:
I just wanted you to know that the day
after our meeting, I met with some other INPO personnel and found out that INPO
has asked all the sites to report out a Reactivity Management PI that basically
is the BWROG RCRC PI, which is currently consistent with the PWROG PI. So
Lee Keller, I guess your request at the meeting is complete already. INPO
Ops people are aware of the initiative of the BWROG RCRC to revise the PI and I
will be working with them on that issue, but I think this makes it imperative
that the PWROG also do the same. I hope to get approval for our new BWROG
PI at the end of January and will then work with the sites and INPO for how
they will handle the sudden change in PI values, targeting July 1 (3rd
quarter) implementation of the new PI across the BWR fleet.
I have already sent information to
Ed McVey