For Surry, our RM procedures have a RM stamp on the front cover.  Specific RM issues may be addressed in the Precautions and Limitations, but usually the specific steps that affect reactivity are covered during the pre-job brief.  Ops has a pre-job brief database that ensures the same info is covered for each task performance, including expected response and lessons learned.  Prior to quarterly rod motion, for a specific example, the brief would include the expected reactivity response for the action being discussed; the brief would also include the differences in the response expected between the various rod banks.    

 

 

 

From INPO 06-006:  Repetitive tasks controlled by procedures or work documents are distinctively marked to highlight those steps or sections that will impact reactivity.

 

Can anyone provide an example of how they meet this characteristic of the INPO guideline? FCS generally has a “Precaution and Limitation” at the beginning of a procedure, or a “Caution” prior to a step that affects reactivity. But, this is not always consistent.

 

Barton P. Schawe, P.E.

Principal Reactor Engineer

Omaha Public Power District

Tel: 402-533-7211

email: bschawe@oppd.com

This transmission contains information which may be confidential and which may also be privileged. It is intended for the named addressee only. Unless you are the named addressee, or authorized to receive it on behalf of the addressee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please contact the sender. Thank you for your cooperation.

 

This e-mail contains Omaha Public Power District's confidential and proprietary information and is for use only by the intended recipient.  Unless explicitly stated otherwise, this e-mail is not a contract offer, amendment, nor acceptance.  If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.