At VC Summer, we mark work orders that affect reactivity, and we have similar cautions and P&Ls to yours.  We don’t have a consistent mark of every step in every procedure that might affect reactivity.

From: pwrrm@retaqs.com [mailto:pwrrm@retaqs.com] On Behalf Of SCHAWE, BARTON P
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:18 AM
To: pwrrm@retaqs.com
Subject: [Pwrrm] Reactivity Management

From INPO 06-006:  Repetitive tasks controlled by procedures or work documents are distinctively marked to highlight those steps or sections that will impact reactivity.

Can anyone provide an example of how they meet this characteristic of the INPO guideline? FCS generally has a “Precaution and Limitation” at the beginning of a procedure, or a “Caution” prior to a step that affects reactivity. But, this is not always consistent.

Barton P. Schawe, P.E.

Principal Reactor Engineer

Omaha Public Power District

Tel: 402-533-7211

email: bschawe@oppd.com

This transmission contains information which may be confidential and which may also be privileged. It is intended for the named addressee only. Unless you are the named addressee, or authorized to receive it on behalf of the addressee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please contact the sender. Thank you for your cooperation.

This e-mail contains Omaha Public Power District's confidential and proprietary information and is for use only by the intended recipient.  Unless explicitly stated otherwise, this e-mail is not a contract offer, amendment, nor acceptance.  If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.