At STP we use one of our power range nuclear instrumentation (NI) detectors for our reactivity measurements during low power physics testing (LPPT). Recently, on the Unit 2 cycle 15 startup, the gamma compensation (bucking) current for the lower half of the NI detector used for the measurement behaved in an atypical manner. Although the reactivity computer passed its checkout test, the measured worth of the heaviest control rod bank was over-predicted using Westinghouse's Dynamic Rod Worth Measurement (DRWM) technique.
Ultimately, we shutdown the reactor, checked connections and cables, and switched NI detectors. The reactor was restarted and LPPT was successfully performed. Since the NI detectors are used in such a low current range for LPPT, it was decided that the detector which was unsuitable for LPPT use would still provide proper response at power.
Once previously we replaced all of the NI detectors after connecting the reactivity computer and examining detector responses. The detector cables were inspected found to be degraded. In that case, we had not begun reactor startup.
Questions:
1. Have you had a similar experience? 2. As a result, did you change out the NI(s) that cycle? 3. Does this phenomenon foretell detector failure in the power range in subsequent cycles? 4. What procedural guidance in your LPPT procedure is given to decide if an NI is not usable and a new NI should be selected? 5. Does your plant I&C group have a method, other than using the reactivity computer, to determine if an NI is acceptable for use for LPPT?
Thank you in advance for your responses.
Duane Gore Supervisor, Reactor Engineering STPNOC
(361) 972-8909
Duane, can you tell me where you guys ended up classifying this event in Reactivity Management PI space? Thanks.
Ed McVey
Exelon Nuclear Fuels
________________________________
From: pwrrm@retaqs.com [mailto:pwrrm@retaqs.com] On Behalf Of Gore, Duane Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 9:39 AM To: 'pwrrm@retaqs.com' Subject: [Pwrrm] Use of Power Range NI Detectors for Low Power PhysicsTesting
At STP we use one of our power range nuclear instrumentation (NI) detectors for our reactivity measurements during low power physics testing (LPPT). Recently, on the Unit 2 cycle 15 startup, the gamma compensation (bucking) current for the lower half of the NI detector used for the measurement behaved in an atypical manner. Although the reactivity computer passed its checkout test, the measured worth of the heaviest control rod bank was over-predicted using Westinghouse's Dynamic Rod Worth Measurement (DRWM) technique.
Ultimately, we shutdown the reactor, checked connections and cables, and switched NI detectors. The reactor was restarted and LPPT was successfully performed. Since the NI detectors are used in such a low current range for LPPT, it was decided that the detector which was unsuitable for LPPT use would still provide proper response at power.
Once previously we replaced all of the NI detectors after connecting the reactivity computer and examining detector responses. The detector cables were inspected found to be degraded. In that case, we had not begun reactor startup.
Questions:
1. Have you had a similar experience? 2. As a result, did you change out the NI(s) that cycle? 3. Does this phenomenon foretell detector failure in the power range in subsequent cycles? 4. What procedural guidance in your LPPT procedure is given to decide if an NI is not usable and a new NI should be selected? 5. Does your plant I&C group have a method, other than using the reactivity computer, to determine if an NI is acceptable for use for LPPT?
Thank you in advance for your responses.
Duane Gore
Supervisor, Reactor Engineering
STPNOC
(361) 972-8909
----------------------------------------- ************************************************** This e-mail and any of its attachments may contain Exelon Corporation proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to the Exelon Corporation family of Companies. This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout. Thank You. **************************************************
-
edward.mcvey＠exeloncorp.com -
Gore, Duane