Respvr August 2006

respvr@retaqs.com

3 participants
3 discussions

Bob Tomonto/Ptn/Nuclear/FplNuc is out of the office.
by Bob_Tomonto＠fpl.com 08 Aug '06

08 Aug '06

I will be out of the office starting 08/07/2006 and will not return until 09/07/2006. I will respond to your message when I return.

1 0

Zinc Injection and CIPS/AOA
by Gore, Duane 08 Aug '06

08 Aug '06

South Texas is contemplating performing zinc injection to reduce crud and doses. However, as a high duty plant, we are also worried about kicking off CIPS/AOA. Up to now, we have not had this phenomenon - and I'd like to stay away from it. I would like to get the reactor engineers' take on (1) your opinion on zinc injection v CIPS (2) if your plant has performed Zn injection, a. what consideration was given to potential CIPS issues? b. what has been your experience with the core? (3) If your plant has decided not to pursue Zn injection, what were the reasons (was CIPS a factor)? Thank you for your response. Duane Gore Reactor Engineering Supervisor South Texas Project (361) 972-8909 degore(a)stpegs.com

1 0

Surry Reactivity Management Self Assessment Additional Questions
by Michael_Fanguy＠dom.com 02 Aug '06

02 Aug '06

Surry Operations and Reactor Engineering departments are performing a Self Assessment on our Reactivity Management program this week. An email survey was recently sent out in support of this SA. Our thanks go out to all those that responded. We also have a few follow up questions. If it would be possible, please respond to these few questions within the next 2 days to James_Shell(a)dom.com. Again thanks for your participation in our Self Assessment! 1. What is the content of reactivity plans covered at your Ops shift brief? (i.e. do they discuss how much water they plan to add during the shift, rod motion predicted, etc..) 2. If they deviate from said plan what actions are necessary (i.e. contact Shift Manager, Reactor Engineer, STA, etc...or would it just be between the SRO and RO) 3. Would they only elevate it to Reactor Engineering if the deviation was significant, or would they call you for any change at all regardless of how small? Please respond to: James_Shell(a)dom.com James D. Shell Reactor Engineering Surry Power Station Office: 757-365-2865 Fax: 757-365-2750 Michael J. Fanguy Nuclear Analysis & Fuel Lead Reactor Engineer Surry Power Station Email: Michael_Fanguy(a)Dom.com Phone: 757-365-2155 Pager #: 3453 ----------------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message contains information which may be legally confidential and/or privileged and does not in any case represent a firm ENERGY COMMODITY bid or offer relating thereto which binds the sender without an additional express written confirmation to that effect. The information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

Respvr August 2006