From INPO 06-006: Repetitive tasks controlled by procedures or work documents are distinctively marked to highlight those steps or sections that will impact reactivity.
Can anyone provide an example of how they meet this characteristic of the INPO guideline? FCS generally has a "Precaution and Limitation" at the beginning of a procedure, or a "Caution" prior to a step that affects reactivity. But, this is not always consistent.
Barton P. Schawe, P.E. Principal Reactor Engineer Omaha Public Power District Tel: 402-533-7211 email: bschawe@oppd.commailto:bschawe@oppd.com This transmission contains information which may be confidential and which may also be privileged. It is intended for the named addressee only. Unless you are the named addressee, or authorized to receive it on behalf of the addressee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please contact the sender. Thank you for your cooperation.
This e-mail contains Omaha Public Power District's confidential and proprietary information and is for use only by the intended recipient. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, this e-mail is not a contract offer, amendment, nor acceptance. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
At VC Summer, we mark work orders that affect reactivity, and we have similar cautions and P&Ls to yours. We don't have a consistent mark of every step in every procedure that might affect reactivity.
From: pwrrm@retaqs.com [mailto:pwrrm@retaqs.com] On Behalf Of SCHAWE, BARTON P Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:18 AM To: pwrrm@retaqs.com Subject: [Pwrrm] Reactivity Management
From INPO 06-006: Repetitive tasks controlled by procedures or work documents are distinctively marked to highlight those steps or sections that will impact reactivity.
Can anyone provide an example of how they meet this characteristic of the INPO guideline? FCS generally has a "Precaution and Limitation" at the beginning of a procedure, or a "Caution" prior to a step that affects reactivity. But, this is not always consistent.
Barton P. Schawe, P.E. Principal Reactor Engineer Omaha Public Power District Tel: 402-533-7211 email: bschawe@oppd.commailto:bschawe@oppd.com This transmission contains information which may be confidential and which may also be privileged. It is intended for the named addressee only. Unless you are the named addressee, or authorized to receive it on behalf of the addressee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please contact the sender. Thank you for your cooperation.
This e-mail contains Omaha Public Power District's confidential and proprietary information and is for use only by the intended recipient. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, this e-mail is not a contract offer, amendment, nor acceptance. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
At Turkey Point, the procedures that could affect core reactivity have a special designator in our controlled document database (an "N" displayed after the procedure number) and a notice on the cover page. The older procedures have an inserted page stating "CAUTION REACTIVITY MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE" and the upgraded procedures have a block on the cover page stating "This is a Reactivity Management Procedure". Examples are attached.
Mark Dicus Turkey Point Reactor Engineering 305-246-6185
From: pwrrm@retaqs.com [mailto:pwrrm@retaqs.com] On Behalf Of SCHAWE, BARTON P Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:18 AM To: pwrrm@retaqs.com Subject: [Pwrrm] Reactivity Management
From INPO 06-006: Repetitive tasks controlled by procedures or work documents are distinctively marked to highlight those steps or sections that will impact reactivity.
Can anyone provide an example of how they meet this characteristic of the INPO guideline? FCS generally has a "Precaution and Limitation" at the beginning of a procedure, or a "Caution" prior to a step that affects reactivity. But, this is not always consistent.
Barton P. Schawe, P.E. Principal Reactor Engineer Omaha Public Power District Tel: 402-533-7211 email: bschawe@oppd.commailto:bschawe@oppd.com This transmission contains information which may be confidential and which may also be privileged. It is intended for the named addressee only. Unless you are the named addressee, or authorized to receive it on behalf of the addressee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please contact the sender. Thank you for your cooperation.
This e-mail contains Omaha Public Power District's confidential and proprietary information and is for use only by the intended recipient. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, this e-mail is not a contract offer, amendment, nor acceptance. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
For Surry, our RM procedures have a RM stamp on the front cover. Specific RM issues may be addressed in the Precautions and Limitations, but usually the specific steps that affect reactivity are covered during the pre-job brief. Ops has a pre-job brief database that ensures the same info is covered for each task performance, including expected response and lessons learned. Prior to quarterly rod motion, for a specific example, the brief would include the expected reactivity response for the action being discussed; the brief would also include the differences in the response expected between the various rod banks.
Adina LaFrance
The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them. -Albert Einstein
Nuclear Analysis & Fuel Reactor Engineer Surry Power Station Email: Adina.K.LaFrance@Dom.commailto:Adina.K.LaFrance@Dom.com Phone: 757-365-2658 Pager #: 4290
From: pwrrm@retaqs.com [mailto:pwrrm@retaqs.com] On Behalf Of SCHAWE, BARTON P Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:18 AM To: pwrrm@retaqs.com Subject: [Pwrrm] Reactivity Management
From INPO 06-006: Repetitive tasks controlled by procedures or work documents are distinctively marked to highlight those steps or sections that will impact reactivity.
Can anyone provide an example of how they meet this characteristic of the INPO guideline? FCS generally has a "Precaution and Limitation" at the beginning of a procedure, or a "Caution" prior to a step that affects reactivity. But, this is not always consistent.
Barton P. Schawe, P.E. Principal Reactor Engineer Omaha Public Power District Tel: 402-533-7211 email: bschawe@oppd.commailto:bschawe@oppd.com This transmission contains information which may be confidential and which may also be privileged. It is intended for the named addressee only. Unless you are the named addressee, or authorized to receive it on behalf of the addressee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please contact the sender. Thank you for your cooperation.
This e-mail contains Omaha Public Power District's confidential and proprietary information and is for use only by the intended recipient. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, this e-mail is not a contract offer, amendment, nor acceptance. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message contains information which may be legally confidential and or privileged and does not in any case represent a firm ENERGY COMMODITY bid or offer relating thereto which binds the sender without an additional express written confirmation to that effect. The information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
Beaver Valley response: We don't have a consistent approach. Some repetitive Work Orders are tagged as reactivity impact. There are also "stop" signs in some procedures where steps could impact reactivity.
Anthony (A.R.) Burger Supervisor, Reactor Engineering FENOC - Beaver Valley Power Station Phone: (724) 682-4108 Cell: (724) 601-3224 FAX: (724) 682-4250 Email: aburger@firstenergycorp.com
"SCHAWE, BARTON P" <bschawe@oppd.com To > "pwrrm@retaqs.com" Sent by: pwrrm@retaqs.com pwrrm@retaqs.com cc
Subject 09/30/2009 08:18 [Pwrrm] Reactivity Management AM
Please respond to PWR Reactivity Management <pwrrm@retaqs.com >
From INPO 06-006: Repetitive tasks controlled by procedures or work documents are distinctively marked to highlight those steps or sections that will impact reactivity.
Can anyone provide an example of how they meet this characteristic of the INPO guideline? FCS generally has a “Precaution and Limitation” at the beginning of a procedure, or a “Caution” prior to a step that affects reactivity. But, this is not always consistent.
Barton P. Schawe, P.E. Principal Reactor Engineer Omaha Public Power District Tel: 402-533-7211 email: bschawe@oppd.com This transmission contains information which may be confidential and which may also be privileged. It is intended for the named addressee only. Unless you are the named addressee, or authorized to receive it on behalf of the addressee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please contact the sender. Thank you for your cooperation.
This e-mail contains Omaha Public Power District's confidential and proprietary information and is for use only by the intended recipient. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, this e-mail is not a contract offer, amendment, nor acceptance. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
_______________________________________________ PWRRM mailing list PWRRM@retaqs.com http://www.keffective.com/mailman/listinfo/pwrrm