Respvr

respvr@retaqs.com

120 discussions

RE: [Respvr] FW: A short survey to see who Reactor Engineering reportsdirectly to.
by ALDAY, CLINT L 13 Mar '07

13 Mar '07

Waterford currently reports to Nuclear Engineering Manager on-site. This is changing (back to again) the System Engineering Manager in May. Clint Alday -----Original Message----- From: respvr-bounces(a)retaqs.com [mailto:respvr-bounces@retaqs.com] On Behalf Of Delk, Whiting S Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 8:34 AM To: respvr(a)retaqs.com Cc: Keck, James M Subject: [Respvr] FW: A short survey to see who Reactor Engineering reportsdirectly to. ________________________________ Subject: A short survey to see who Reactor Engineering reports directly to. TVAN is benchmarking who the Reactor Engineering Section reports to. Thanks for your support. Operations: System Engineering Manager: Corporate Fuels: Engineering Manager or Other: See the BWR below: Summary of the data for BWRs. 10 stations report to OPS 7 stations report to Systems 4 stations report to Nuclear Fuels 3 stations report to Eng Mgr or other Whiting - could you get the same info for PWRs? Summary of the data for BWRs.

1 0

RE: [Respvr] FW: A short survey to see who Reactor Engineering reportsdirectly to.
by MCCOY, JAIME H 13 Mar '07

13 Mar '07

ANO reports to the System Engineering Manager. I spend more time speaking directly to the Engineering Director, GMPO, and VP. -----Original Message----- From: respvr-bounces(a)retaqs.com [mailto:respvr-bounces@retaqs.com] On Behalf Of Delk, Whiting S Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 8:34 AM To: respvr(a)retaqs.com Cc: Keck, James M Subject: [Respvr] FW: A short survey to see who Reactor Engineering reportsdirectly to. ________________________________ Subject: A short survey to see who Reactor Engineering reports directly to. TVAN is benchmarking who the Reactor Engineering Section reports to. Thanks for your support. Operations: System Engineering Manager: Corporate Fuels: Engineering Manager or Other: See the BWR below: Summary of the data for BWRs. 10 stations report to OPS 7 stations report to Systems 4 stations report to Nuclear Fuels 3 stations report to Eng Mgr or other Whiting - could you get the same info for PWRs? Summary of the data for BWRs.

1 0

Re: [Respvr] FW: A short survey to see who Reactor Engineering reports directly to.
by paul_gurney＠fpl.com 13 Mar '07

13 Mar '07

Whiting, Seabrook REs report to Engineering Manager or Other. Paul Gurney

1 0

Test
by MCCOY, JAIME H 13 Mar '07

13 Mar '07

Test

1 0

Secondary Calorimetric Feedback Needed (PWR) - Heat Balance (BWR)
by WILLETT, JOSEPH E 07 Feb '07

07 Feb '07

To All, I apologize, this is a repeat Request, but the HIT Team I'm working on needs more specific information regarding secondary calorimetric calculations. I could use a reply by February 15th. Fort Calhoun Station is currently experiencing 3-5 MWth swings (peak-to-peak) in a one hour period to on our secondary calorimetric calculation. This last outage we replaced both S/Gs and refurbished our FW regulation valves. Prior to this outage our swings were normally 1 MW over 4 hour period. We attempt to keep power at a corporate goal of 1498 MWth (1500 MWth is our rated power level). We do not see these swings on the NI or Delta-T power indications that follow the secondary calorimetric swings. We have not implemented Appendix K using ultrasonic flow measurement for Main feedwater as of yet. Our Question(s) 1) What are other plants goals/expectations for maintaining power level? (=/- MW or goal); -How easy is it to maintain? -Is there a band within which you operate? What is it? Is it maintained? -What procedure or guidance is provided to your operators? -Can I get a copy of the procedure? 2) How is your secondary calculation performed? (Averaging Inputs, Instantaneous values, combination) -Is it a module or program on your plant computer or is it an off-line routine? -What is the frequency of the calculations utilized? (1 sec, 1 minute, 10 minutes 30 minutes, etc...)? -What is the frequency of the scan rate for input parameters utilized? (1 sec, 1 minute, 10 minutes 30 minutes, etc...)? Does it vary by parameter? Are they averaged, and for how long? (30 seconds, 60 seconds, etc...) -What is there BASIS for the calculation? Is there supporting documentation? What is it? -What frequency do the operators control to? (2 minute average, 10 minute average, 30 minute average, etc....) 3) Are your temperature and flow transmitters set specifically for this calculation? (dampening or bias settings) 4) Are any of your control loops (Feedwater) used in the secondary calorimetric calculation? 5) Have you had any issues related to power swings or related to your secondary calorimetric? 6) Who has ownership/control of your program/logic? System Engineering, Design Engineering, Operations, Reactor Engineering or some other department? J. E. Willett ---------------------------------------------------- Joseph E. Willett, P.E. Principal Reactor Engineer-Fuel Nuclear Operations Division E-mail: jwillett(a)oppd.com Omaha Public Power District Phone: (402) 533-7213 P.O. Box 99 Pager: (402) 561-3899 Ft. Calhoun, NE 68023-0390 FAX: (402) 533-6747 Mail Station: FC-1-1 Plant ---------------------------------------------------- -------- This e-mail contains Omaha Public Power District's confidential and proprietary information and is for use only by the intended recipient. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, this e-mail is not a contract offer, amendment, nor acceptance. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

2 1

Paul V. Gurney/NAESCO is out of the office.
by paul_gurney＠fpl.com 06 Feb '07

06 Feb '07

I will be out of the office starting 02/05/2007 and will not return until 02/09/2007.

1 0

Secondary Calorimetric Feedback Needed (PWR) - Heat Balance (BWR)
by WILLETT, JOSEPH E 06 Feb '07

06 Feb '07

To All, I apologize, this is a repeat Request, but the HIT Team I'm working on needs more specific information regarding secondary calorimetric calculations. I could use a reply by February 15th. Fort Calhoun Station is currently experiencing 3-5 MWth swings (peak-to-peak) in a one hour period to on our secondary calorimetric calculation. This last outage we replaced both S/Gs and refurbished our FW regulation valves. Prior to this outage our swings were normally 1 MW over 4 hour period. We attempt to keep power at a corporate goal of 1498 MWth (1500 MWth is our rated power level). We do not see these swings on the NI or Delta-T power indications that follow the secondary calorimetric swings. We have not implemented Appendix K using ultrasonic flow measurement for Main feedwater as of yet. Our Question(s) 1) What are other plants goals/expectations for maintaining power level? (=/- MW or goal); -How easy is it to maintain? -Is there a band within which you operate? What is it? Is it maintained? -What procedure or guidance is provided to your operators? -Can I get a copy of the procedure? 2) How is your secondary calculation performed? (Averaging Inputs, Instantaneous values, combination) -Is it a module or program on your plant computer or is it an off-line routine? -What is the frequency of the calculations utilized? (1 sec, 1 minute, 10 minutes 30 minutes, etc...)? -What is the frequency of the scan rate for input parameters utilized? (1 sec, 1 minute, 10 minutes 30 minutes, etc...)? Does it vary by parameter? Are they averaged, and for how long? (30 seconds, 60 seconds, etc...) -What is there BASIS for the calculation? Is there supporting documentation? What is it? -What frequency do the operators control to? (2 minute average, 10 minute average, 30 minute average, etc....) 3) Are your temperature and flow transmitters set specifically for this calculation? (dampening or bias settings) 4) Are any of your control loops (Feedwater) used in the secondary calorimetric calculation? 5) Have you had any issues related to power swings or related to your secondary calorimetric? 6) Who has ownership/control of your program/logic? System Engineering, Design Engineering, Operations, Reactor Engineering or some other department? J. E. Willett ------------------------------------------------- Joseph E. Willett, P.E. Principal Reactor Engineer, Nuclear Operations E-mail: jwillett(a)oppd.com <mailto:jwillett@oppd.com%20> OR Omaha Public Power District Phone: (402) 533-7213 P.O. Box 399 Pager: (402) 561-3899 Ft. Calhoun, NE 68023-0390 FAX: (402) 533-6747 Mail Station: FC-1-1 Plant This e-mail contains Omaha Public Power District's confidential and proprietary information and is for use only by the intended recipient. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, this e-mail is not a contract offer, amendment, nor acceptance. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

1 0

Re: [Respvr] Question on Power Range NI Replacement
by Bob_Tomonto＠fpl.com 31 Jan '07

31 Jan '07

Michael, We often have to replace power range detectors during refueling outages. Turkey Point has a history of water leakage into the excore detector wells resulting in degradation to the excore detectors. We recently changed to titanium housed detectors on the intermediate range and power range detectors to improve the lifetime (more corrosion resistant). Procedurally we require the Power Range High Flux Trip setpoint to be set at 55% and only after acceptable NIS Calibration of all the detectors (as developed from a flux map at 48%), do we reset the high flux trip setpoint to 108%. If I can be of any help, please do not hesitate to call me at (305) 246-7327. Bob Tomonto FPL Turkey Point Reactor Engineering Michael_Fanguy@do m.com To: respvr(a)keffective.com, pwrrm(a)keffective.com Sent by: cc: Robert_A._Wright(a)dom.com respvr-bounces@re Subject: [Respvr] Question on Power Range NI Replacement taqs.com 01/31/2007 07:38 AM Please respond to "RE Supervisors" This email is being sent out for North Anna Reactor Engineering. North Anna (3 loop Westinghouse) is planning to replace a PRNI in their next outage. The question is do other utilities put any special measure in place for startup due to the new detector? Are your Hi Flux Trips extremely low? Is the startup performed with the NI channel in TRIP? Any feedback would be appreciated. Please send your responses to Robert_A._Wright(a)dom.com. Nuclear Analysis & Fuel Lead Reactor Engineer Surry Power Station Email: Michael_Fanguy(a)Dom.com Phone: 757-365-2155 Pager #: 3453 ----------------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message contains information which may be legally confidential and/or privileged and does not in any case represent a firm ENERGY COMMODITY bid or offer relating thereto which binds the sender without an additional express written confirmation to that effect. The information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Respvr mailing list Respvr(a)retaqs.com http://www.keffective.com/mailman/listinfo/respvr

1 0

Question on Power Range NI Replacement
by Michael_Fanguy＠dom.com 31 Jan '07

31 Jan '07

This email is being sent out for North Anna Reactor Engineering. North Anna (3 loop Westinghouse) is planning to replace a PRNI in their next outage. The question is do other utilities put any special measure in place for startup due to the new detector? Are your Hi Flux Trips extremely low? Is the startup performed with the NI channel in TRIP? Any feedback would be appreciated. Please send your responses to Robert_A._Wright(a)dom.com. Nuclear Analysis & Fuel Lead Reactor Engineer Surry Power Station Email: Michael_Fanguy(a)Dom.com Phone: 757-365-2155 Pager #: 3453 ----------------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message contains information which may be legally confidential and/or privileged and does not in any case represent a firm ENERGY COMMODITY bid or offer relating thereto which binds the sender without an additional express written confirmation to that effect. The information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.

2 1

Bob Tomonto/Ptn/Nuclear/FplNuc is out of the office.
by Bob_Tomonto＠fpl.com 08 Aug '06

08 Aug '06

I will be out of the office starting 08/07/2006 and will not return until 09/07/2006. I will respond to your message when I return.

1 0

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
12
Older →

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

Respvr